30 December 2006, really getting close now
I see that Saddam made it to the great virgin palace in the sky, you've gotta hand it to those guys. When they pass a death sentence, they mean it. David, in Florida, mentioned to me via IM this morning that they just executed a guy who had been on death row for 28 years at the time, was 27 when sentenced. I'm ambiguous about the death penalty, a bit wishy-washy sometimes, but generally in favor of it...and especially in a case like Saddam's, where I believe there was no way forward for Iraq until after that happened. We're actually lucky that he was a coward and did not choose to die in battle, leading his troops against the Crusaders.
It will be interesting to see how many people now are willing to speak up, finally certain Saddam isn't going to pull of another miraculous escape. Even the New York Times seems more willing, now...
The Defiant Despot Oppressed Iraq for More Than 30 Years
The hanging ended the life of one of the most brutal tyrants in recent history.
I guess they've lost the "Iraq was better off under Saddam" clip. Not that any of the Shia were buying that idea, anyhow. And even the Washington Post is suddenly unafraid...
Architect of ruthless Iraqi dictatorship is hanged before dawn for crimes against humanity in the mass murder of Shiite men and boys in the 1980s
I mean, who knew?
Over more than two decades of brutal authoritarian rule, Hussein led his nation from modernity to ruin.
The next thing you know they'll be discovering the reason for their infrastructure problems were not caused by the war, after all. The reason they have shortages of electricity isn't the fault of the Americans...I expect the newspapers will be learning that soon, who knows what changes are in store?
» Edward M. Kennedy | We need to do much more to help Iraqi refugees, especially those who have helped our troops.
Everybody wants to get in on the action, now.
I'm looking forward to the newspapers the rest of the week, as this finally sinks in around the world. Europe will complain, of course...barbaric Americans.
The Washington area will ring in the new year after one of the 10 warmest Decembers in more than 100 years.
Kids, don't try to sell these newspapers in Denver.
Second storm grounds Denver flights
They just managed to get the people out after the first storm. People were marching in the terminal chanting "global warming...NOW!" In response, Senator Kennedy spoke...
Local newspaper item:
Costa Rican immigration agents and police are trying to stop a flood of illegal persons from entering the country from Nicaragua.
Why is it so many people want to flee their own homelands? Check out the governments there, maybe that will give you some clue. I have a friend who tells me that America is a police state. People from REAL police states are dying to get to America, often literally.
It's not clear why anarchists and libertarians don't go somewhere and set up their own country, living happily free from police.
From Victor Davis Hanson:
In Iran's city council elections
last week, moderate conservative and reformist candidates defeated
Ahmadinejad's vehemently anti-American slate of allies. At a recent public
meeting, angry Iranian students -- tired of theocratic lunacy and repression
-- shouted down their president.
By supporting terrorists in Iraq and Lebanon, enriching uranium and
insanely threatening to destroy a nuclear Israel, Mr. Ahmadinejad is only
alienating Iranians, who wonder where their once vast oil revenues went and
how they can possibly pay for all these wild adventures.
Some Iranian students might even be smart enough to realize that while one nuke might destroy Israel, they will see a few bright lights in their own skies as a result. It might be worth it to Ah-mad, but maybe not to them.
Even the neighboring Palestinians might not think becoming radioactively hot is so hot. The Palestinian state they had in mind is not comatose or worse.
Meanwhile, Mr. Ahmadinejad has invested little in the source of his wealth -- the oil infrastructure of Iran. Soon, even the country's once-sure oil revenues will start to decline.
Interestingly enough, the MSM are starting to discover that this is what Saddam allowed to happen in Iraq for several decades. The reason Iraqis don't have adequate electricity, water, sewers, etc, is two-fold. The first is because Saddam let everything fall apart through neglect, he wanted the repair money spent on his palaces.
The second, which the papers don't really like mentioning, is that the new Iraq, even under present conditions, has greatly increased the demand for electricity and other services.
These are excerpts from an article on a slightly different subject, you should read the whole thing. In fact, I recommend you always read anything you can find with his name on it. Even if you don't always agree with him he will make you think about things differently. There are only a small handful of writers I can recommend unreservedly, and he's one of them.
In all this chaos -- which will take years to settle -- the United States needs to stick to its principles. Neither immediate military intervention nor dialogue with Iran is the answer. Instead, we must just keep up the pressure on the trash-talking Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is far weaker than he lets on.
One thing I've noticed about the so-called 'trash-talkers' is that they are typically trying to cover up vulnerability with bluster. You never see the real champions, the ones who can actually carry the water, do that. Ted Williams didn't say much.
As Ol' Diz used to say, it ain't boasting if you can do it.
"Never have I felt so insignificant, part of a scene so obviously set by God." -- Astronaut Thomas D. Jones, looking at the home planet while floating near the International Space Station 200 miles aloft.
Don't you just hate having to break it to him that what he saw all happened by accident?
From Slate's Mickey Kaus:
Sen. Tim Johnson is still under sedation, and AP's report contains this alarming quote (missing from the version now posted on WaPo):
Dr. Keith Siller, director of the Comprehensive Stroke Care Center at NYU Medical Center and assistant professor at the NYU School of Medicine, said it is unusual for a patient to be sedated after brain surgery for more than a few days.
"The two-week period is longer than I would be happy with," he said.
Siller is not the doctor on the scene, of course. Congressional Quarterly has some more encouraging stats [via IP]. ... He said it: Only Slate 's Tim Noah, however, has had the balls to prematurely speculate about a partisan Schiavo do-si-do in which Tom DeLay suddenly realizes that 'quality of life' is what counts, while Democrats discover that maybe the Schiavo conservatives had a point.
It's sad for Johnson, of course, and thus difficult to talk about politically, but Noah has a good point. It's odd how viewpoints change when it is your/their ox being gored.
But I still think there's a huge difference. The people who most wanted Schiavo kept alive were her parents. They were willing and able to shoulder the financial and emotional burden. Why not allow them to do so?
The person who most wanted her dead was a 'husband' who had already moved on to another woman and fathered children by her...oh, and by sheer coincidence stood to pick up a bundle of cash when Schiavo died.
So you had one side willing to spend money to keep her alive, the other side willing to collect money to let her die. No matter WHAT you think about the "quality of life" argument, it should be easy for you to figure out the motivations of the various parties involved.
And while I hesitate to speculate about Reid's motives, since I dislike the man and that no doubt influences me here, it's a fact that with Johnson alive Senator Reid is the majority leader, even if poor Senator Johnson is in a Schiavo state of mind.
As the Romas said and we should always remember: Cui bono? To whose advantage is it that something does or does not happen?
(And I hope the obvious solution to the situation never occurs now to Terri's parents. They should simply have "bought" her from the husband, paying him what he would have collected from her death. Would he have done that? You bet your bippy!)
Speaking of language...Carol says she is trying to view the download of Saddam's hanging, but there are so many people trying to access the site at the same time, apparently, she says that the download hangs up.
I couldn't help but laugh.
If you don't feel like laughing, read this about Kwanzaa! It will make you weep.
Quick spin to a laugh-out-loud line for me from an article about Samuel Johnson:
Even literary masterpieces didn't escape his forceful criticism. Henry Fielding, one of England's greatest novelists, was "a blockhead." Paradise Lost, he said, "is one of the books which the reader admires and puts down, and forgets to take up again. None ever wished it longer than it is."
More good stuff:
The experience he gained from being a careful practical lexicographer also gave him insight into how language works in general, and his comments on language show a sensitivity that was unparalleled in his day, and has few rivals in our own. One of the perennial debates among people who discuss the language is whether it is the job of commentators to be prescriptive or descriptive. The prescriptivists tell you the way the language should be; the descriptivists tell you the way it is.
The prescriptivists warn against splitting infinitives and insist that it's wrong to end sentences with prepositions; the descriptivists say such rules are artificial and old-fashioned, and a linguist should care only about the way real people speak and write. The two sides glower at each other across the pages of scholarly journals and editorial pages: The prescriptivists see themselves as champions of standards of propriety and their opponents as wild-eyed linguistic anarchists; the descriptivists see themselves as realists and their opponents as inflexible linguistic authoritarians. And many on both sides are eager to claim the authority of Johnson, the first great theorist of the English language, to support their cause.
So which camp is Johnson's? It should be no surprise that there's no consensus. Those who claim Johnson was a prescriptivist point to entries in his Dictionary like ruse, which Johnson says is "A French word neither elegant nor necessary," or scomm, "A word out of use, and unworthy of revival." The word thro' was "Contracted by barbarians from through," and disannul should "be rejected as ungrammatical and barbarous." Here Johnson seems to be delivering edicts, issuing verdicts on whether words should live or die.
Those who see him as a pioneer descriptivist, on the other hand, point to passages in the Dictionary like this: "It is not in our power to have recourse to any established laws of speech, but we must remark how the writers of former ages have used the same word"--in other words, the only guide to language is usage, not logic, not rules. He wrote that his job was not to "form, but register the language," not to "teach men how they should think, but relate how they have hitherto expressed their thoughts."
Excellent excellence. Some infinitives simply sound better when split, and sometimes ending a sentence with a preposition simply feels right...because that's the way people speak. I don't know about you, but I "hear" every word that I read or write.
This often brings me to a halt when I come to a completely new word, or one that I have never heard spoken because it isn't commonplace.
I'm very interested in words, what they mean, how they are defined, and also the fact that they mean different things to different people at different times.
Okay, now, are you ready to read something really incredible?
The only way to settle this question is through careful attention to Johnson's Dictionary, his great monument to the English language. Reading the entire work from cover to cover, though, is the work of months, even years. Johnson defines some 43,000 words, illustrating those words with around 115,000 quotations from great English authors, in a book that stretches to roughly three million words of text.
To put that in perspective, Moby-Dick, War and Peace, and the collected works of Shakespeare combined are just over half the length of Johnson's Dictionary
Holy crap, to quote a recent linguistic favorite. And this was only PART of what Johnson did!
The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson has been underway since the mid-1950s, and after half a century is finally nearing completion. When finished, it will be the first collected edition of Johnson's works since 1825; already it's a major scholarly achievement.
Holy crap!
The preface (of Johnson's Dictionary) opens with his gloomy survey of the prospect before him:
"It is the fate of those who toil at the lower employments of life, to be rather driven by the fear of evil, than attracted by the prospect of good; to be exposed to censure, without hope of praise; to be disgraced by miscarriage, or punished for neglect, where success would have been without applause, and diligence without reward.
Among these unhappy mortals is the writer of dictionaries; whom mankind have considered, not as the pupil, but the slave of science, the pionier of literature, doomed only to remove rubbish and clear obstructions from the paths of Learning and Genius, who press forward to conquest and glory, without bestowing a smile on the humble drudge that facilitates their progress. Every other authour may aspire to praise; the lexicographer can only hope to escape reproach, and even this negative recompence has been yet granted to very few."
Even negative recompense is better than none at all. A favorite saying of mine was made by Martial (Marcus Valerius Martialis) who wrote: "He does not write at all, whose poems no man reads". Quoted from memory, the word might have been "works" rather than "poems", but he wrote poems.
He also described today's Democrats: "What's a wretched man? A man whom no man pleases."
What I find difficult to believe is where Johnson found the time in one single lifetime to write even just the Dictionary, let alone everything else that he did...so much that it has taken Yale half a century to compile it all, and even after an earlier collection in 1825 to begin from. A preposition to end a sentence with.
"The English Dictionary was written with little assistance of the learned, and without any patronage of the great; not in the soft obscurities of retirement, or under the shelter of academick bowers, but amidst inconvenience and distraction, in sickness and in sorrow. . . . I have protracted my work till most of those whom I wished to please, have sunk into the grave, and success and miscarriage are empty sounds: I therefore dismiss it with frigid tranquillity, having little to fear or hope from censure or from praise."
An amazing man. How little I know about so many things I should know.
From the incredible to the incredible. John Nichols, writing in The Nation about Saddam, says that he had a show trial and a show execution! You have to figure a guy has an axe to grind when he describes a secretive event held before dawn in an unknown location as a "show" execution, and Nichols does:
This is the ugly legacy of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq: An awful mess of a country that cannot even get the trial and punishment of deposed dictator right, a justice system that schedules the taking of life for political and propaganda purposes, a thuggishly brutal state that executes according to whim rather than legal standard.
I have to shake my head and wonder if this man actually believes this or is he cynically writing something because he knows it will sell in certain circles? Limited circles, perhaps, because even the MSM are acknowledging now that the awful mess that is Iraq was created over several decades by Saddam, not over several years by the US invasion and occupation.
Some are even openly acknowledging that Saddam was a very bad man. Oh, yes, I know...the truly hydrophobic are still claiming Bush is worse But, you see, they feel a personal dislike for Bush, for whatever reason, and that trumps reason and logic.
What legal standards were not followed? Why, of course, the ones Nichols things are appropriate. And where does he get his ideas?
According to Human Rights Watch, which has a long and honorable history of documenting and challenging the abuses of Hussein's former government, the execution early Saturday morning followed "a deeply flawed trial" and "marks a significant step away from respect for human rights and the rule of law in Iraq."
For fifteen years, Human Rights Watch had demanded that Hussein be brought to justice for what the group has rightly described as "massive human rights violations." But the group argues that Hussein was not brought to justice.
In addition to objecting at the most fundamental level to the use of the barbaric practice of state-sponsored execution--which is outlawed by the vast majority of the world's nations--Human Rights Watch notes that Hussein was killed before being tried for some of his most well-documented acts of brutality.
He and they don't like state-sponsored execution, although it isn't clear that they support privately-sponsored execution as an alternative, and they've acknowledged that Saddam was plenty guilty enough, he just didn't get tried properly for the right crimes. Liberal Logic.
So now, he huffs, there are no legal standards in Iraq. Not, at least, any he is willing to recognize. They're a thuggish state.
Human Rights Watch, of course, is wholly unable to actually DO anything about the abuses they recognize and document, they can only demand impotently. Guys, it's not a 'demand' if you can't make it happen. And then they complain, afterwards, that the people who finally did do something didn't do it according to their standards.
And by their standards Saddam had a "show" execution.
Which wasn't sufficiently public, I'm afraid, so that the Elvis-sighters and the people who think the Moon landing took place on a Hollywood movie lot will swell to include those who 'know' that Saddam is still alive and has been hidden away somewhere.
Perhaps down a well.
Probably, like Osama, to be brought out just before the 2008 elections.
And since everything on tv tonight is about the late president Ford, I couldn't help but compare him to the late president Hussein. Why did one man go one way, the other man another? Products of different cultures? Well, that makes my choice of cultures to support considerably easier.
Speaking of different cultures, Novak says Pelosi is cleaning out the stables:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi takes office this week puzzling over what to do about Rep. Allen Mollohan, the West Virginia Democrat who, probably thanks to earmarks, became a multi-millionaire while serving 11 terms in Congress.
Mollohan is scheduled to head the Appropriations subcommittee covering the FBI, which is currently investigating him. Several Democratic House members feel Mollohan should at least recuse himself from considering FBI appropriations, but some feel Pelosi should keep him from taking the chairmanship until his case is resolved.
Mollohan has been a strong ally of Pelosi and is close to Rep. John Murtha, another new Appropriations subcommittee chairman also accused of misusing earmarks. Pelosi supported Murtha's unsuccessful candidacy for majority leader.
Democrats should feel good about themselves and their new leadership.
Investor's Business Daily on the euro:
Across Europe, anger with the currency has never been higher. In Italy, officials talk about circulating the lira along with the euro. In France, most now want to scrap the common currency and bring back the franc. In Germany, the Finance Ministry blames the euro for economic stagnation. And a growing share of Germans pine for their beloved deutsche mark.
A special survey by the European Union this month found "the lowest rate of approval for the euro since its introduction" in 1999. Fewer than half of those in the 12 nations that use the euro describe it as "overall advantageous for their country."
This is known as, in the words of the country-western song, some gotta win, some gotta lose. Look around, guys, your being scammed. The half-dozen or so richer nations in your group are taking your money, and will do so until you catch on.
The euro is strong for one big reason: The Fed is done raising interest rates here, but the European Central Bank has just begun. Once the ECB is finished, and Europe's economy slows, the euro's rise is unlikely to continue.
What're the other lyrics? You guys who are crying now ain't seen nothin' yet.
Early in December there was a huge breakthrough in solar energy: Boeing-Spectrolab, with funding from the Bush Energy Department, converted sunlight to electricity with more than 40% efficiency — a world record. The development may lead to solar energy systems that cost only $3 per watt to install, and that generate electricity at only 8 to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour. This could be a big long-term step toward reducing America's reliance on oil.
What will Bush critics do? The Big Oil man financed a break-through in solar energy? Oh, no, say it can't be so...
Want justice in North Carolina? Better be able to afford your lawyer while you are waiting. As Time reports:
Now that the North Carolina State Bar has filed a 17-page, 41-count ethics complaint against District Attorney Michael Nifong's handling of the Duke rape case, there's a different kind of New Year's countdown taking place in Durham: when and under what circumstances will Nifong leave office.
The Dec. 28 ethics charges are expected to be expanded when the state bar's grievance committee meets again Jan. 18. Like a grand jury, the committee meets periodically; the current ethics charges stem from its most recent meeting in October and cover public statements Nifong made about the case last March and April.
They're just now getting around to it, you see. The innocent accused, meanwhile, twist slowly in the wind. One wonders if the Bar would actually have done anything if the internet chatter had not attracted so much publicity?
The North Carolina governor's office, which appointed him to the post, could also ask him to resign from office. Gov. Mike Easley declined to comment publicly Friday.
They couldn't have printed what he said, anyhow.
Power Line has an excerpt from John Burns' NYT article that I missed earlier this morning:
NOBODY who experienced Iraq under the tyranny of Saddam Hussein could imagine, at the height of the terror he imposed on his countrymen, ever pitying him. Pitiless himself, he sent hundreds of thousands of his countrymen to miserable deaths, in the wars he started against Iran and Kuwait, in the torture chambers of his secret police, or on the gallows that became an industry at Abu Ghraib and other charnel houses across Iraq. Iraqis who were caught in his spider’s web of evil, and survived, tell of countless tortures, of the psychopathic pleasure the former dictator appeared to take from inflicting suffering and death.
...
That I could feel pity for him struck the Iraqis with whom I talked as evidence of a profound moral corruption. I came to understand how a Westerner used to the civilities of democracy and due process — even a reporter who thought he grasped the depths of Saddam’s depravity — fell short of the Iraqis’ sense, forged by years of brutality, of the power of his unmitigated evil.
He sees due process where Nichols sees thuggery.
And, even more interestingly...the Iraqis look at even his pity as moral corruption. I wonder when we'll hear again from the people who say Iraq was better off under Saddam. I wonder if any of them would be willing to go over there and say it to the Iraqis?
No, you're right...I don't really wonder about that.
Also borrowed from Power Line:
Scott Ott has it, along with word of coming attractions:
Mr. Woodward said he would not comment on rumors that he will soon publish interviews with singers James Brown and Lou Rawls, cartoonist Joseph Barbera, actors Don Knotts, Jack Palance, Glenn Ford, June Allyson, Dennis Weaver, Shelley Winters and Jane Wyatt, as well as Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin and sportscaster Curt Gowdy, all of whom died in 2006 and may have been secretly critical of Mr. Bush’s rationale for invading Iraq.
I know I'm sick, but I still enjoyed this one:
SENATOR JOHN KERRY
304 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON DC 20510
DEAR SENATOR KERRY:
WE ARE STILL LAUGHING OVER HERE IN IRAQ AT YOUR JOKE ABOUT THE TROOPS BEING
DUMB. WE DO RECOGNIZE THAT YOU ARE A LOT SMARTER THAN WE ARE BECAUSE YOU
WERE ABLE TO GET OUT OF COMBAT IN THREE MONTHS. THIS IS WHY WE ARE SEEKING
YOUR ADVICE. PLEASE GIVE US GUIDANCE.
1.) WHERE IS THE LEAST PAINFUL AREA ON THE BODY TO INFLICT A WOUND?
2.) DOES IT HAVE TO BLEED OR WILL A SCRATCH DO?
3.) WHERE DO YOU GET THE FORMS TO FILL OUT RECOMMENDING YOURSELF FOR A
PURPLE HEART?
4.) DO YOU NEED A WITNESS? IF SO, HOW MUCH DOES THAT COST?
5.) ARE THREE PURPLE HEARTS STILL GOOD FOR A TRIP HOME?
6.) WHAT IS A REALISTIC PERIOD OF TIME IN WHICH TO ACQUIRE THESE
WOUNDS? LESS THAN THREE MONTHS SOUNDS A LITTLE SUSPICIOUS EVEN TO US
THANKS FOR YOUR HELP AND KEEP THE JOKES COMING.
JUST A DUMB G.I.
P.S.--WHAT ADVICE CAN YOU GIVE ME ON HOW TO MEET REALLY RICH WOMEN?
Kerry, who almost four years ago, now, promised to release his military records, has still not done so.
Oddly enough. He could destroy the Swift Boaters just by doing so. One single stroke...bam! What did you say? He's too much of a gentleman to do that? Oh.
One more night left to escape 2006. Actually, my clock says it's a coupe of minutes after midnight now, I'm already into the final day of the year.
I'll be happy to start anew. Losing Dad was worse than I thought, I imagined I was prepared for the idea, it's the normal course of events, after all, but it wasn't. Tony, today, at age 3 and a half, is working on his letters. He just brought me five pages of his efforts...Tony Calkins, Nana Calkins, Dee Dee Calkins, Papa Calkins, and abuela...grandfather. Choked me up.
Poor Tony, he doesn't understand why grandfather isn't here any more than he understands why his mother isn't here, they simply are not. I keep flashing back to Forrest Gump, where one minute his mother and friends and comrades from Vietnam would be there and then, just like that, he said, they were gone.
I love my little boy so much. He is a tough, resilient, independent little kid, because he has had to be in order to survive. How much love can you give to a parent who will suddenly disappear without warning for no apparent reason? He is MY boy and I am HIS Papa, only me, and that is the rock upon which we base our private church.
Me, Tarzan; you, Boy,
Jane? Oh, she wash dishes. From time to time we rescue her from some bad guys. Make movies. Cheetah star.
It's hard on Carol, no doubt about that. She cannot be Mama because Tony knows his birth mother, she shows up to visit now and then. It isn't entirely her fault, she's an illegal immigrant dodging the bullets, and whenever she can get a job it's more important than anything else at that moment.
You cannot really appreciate immigration problems until you are part of them.